January 6, 2020
I thought that since the Democrat-Liberal-Hollywood Triumvirate is wringing their hands over the sure fact we are - or soon will be - involved in The Final World War III with Iran, that I would take a few minutes and produce the news headline as they would like to see it printed. Hopefully, the LA Times won't send the FBI shock troops to my front door - their Glock 19's, Uzi's and M-9's drawn - for making use of their archival photo as it fit so perfectly. Ed.
Now, for my opinion piece on what's going on:
There be will be no all out "war" with Iran. If they shoot a missile at US troops, the US will shoot 2 to 4 in return (NB: I wrote the preceding sentence in my draft of this post before President Trump Tweeted this). Iran may have 35 targets planned, but Trump has said that he has 52, which means he probably has closer to 75, all of which are,undoubtedly, focused on Iran's ability to wage war. What this means is that in a war of attrition, Iran loses. There is no possibility Iran would ever come out on top, and especially so with Donald Trump as Commander-in-Chief of the US Military. Besides, Iran has domestic trouble at home; there is documented unrest in their own backyard. They cannot afford a war with the US as they would have, in fact, a two-front war. And no one nation has won a war while fighting on two fronts, as Germany found out in WWII. To pay attention to only the one, leaves the other wide-open for exploitation.
So...Iran is a screamer, albeit a dangerous one, and should be handled with clarity, forcefulness and strength of purpose. But in the end, a screamer is all they will remain.
Trump's handling of the current situation is correct. Speaking to Iran with the aforementioned clarity, forcefulness and strength of purpose ensures that Iran will have gotten the message. Whether or not they understand it is another matter entirely. Even if they do understand, they may still attack with their rockets and terrorist androids. Casualties may yet be had on both sides, though I pray it never gets to that point. I have one son currently in the Marines, and three more of age able to be called up, so I have a vested interest in wanting true peace maintained but NOT "a peace for our time" as Neville Chamberlain, the English appeaser & Prime Minister said in 1938. There is a difference in the two that, sadly, many of the above Democrat-Liberal-Hollywood Triumvirate fail to grasp.
Now, obviously, I am no geopolitical aficionado and most definitely am not on the NSC, sitting beside Donald Trump's right ear. All I have is what I read of the situation, think on the broader picture and try to understand who we have for a President. Who we have and what we have is a man and President who will act to defend this Country and its military to the best of his abilities, and not be a 21st Century Neville Chamberlain. Despite being hobbled by inner-circle anarchists and external enemies from before his election, he has done an amazing job.
My stated views and opinions might be so far off the mark as to laugh me right into internet obscurity. No matter...I've tried to use my God-given common sense and intellect to make sense of what I see and hear. Whether I am ultimately proved naively wrong or presciently correct, at least I've kept my wits and did not lose control of the broader picture and allowed my emotions to drive my thoughts, words and actions.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the Democrat-Liberal-Hollywood Triumvirate.
Copyright 2020 M3 Squared - All Rights Reserved